Investing in the Recovery

"What is Hot? And What is NOT For 2010 and Beyond?"
a presentation by Dr Tony McGough, Global Head of Forecasting DTZ.

Tony did well in flying around the world in twelve minutes analysing real estate investment opportunities. His talk had several dimensions -– risk and length of investment. Tony felt that investors could handle the big roller coaster rides over the medium term (ten years). However, if one was just looking at the short term (up to five years), then one should go for stability and minimal risk.

For the Asia Pacific region, China fits the roller coaster ride for the medium term whereas Australia was more stable and for the short term. The developing economies were the ones that would see booms and busts in the development cycle as well as suffering from political risk. China has good potential long term growth. The second tier Chinese cities with circa 40m people should be on the radar screen. Retail rents here did not fall.

Continental Europe was a tale of two halves -– the East and the West. Central and Eastern Europe were badly hit in the downturn as secondary property prices were very expensive. For the medium term, places such as Prague and Warsaw were identified as opportunities, not Bulgaria or the Ukraine. Go west if one was looking for stability and if one did not have the stomach for risk.

The UK has recovered with prime product leading the charge. For IPD, all commercial property has seen a 100bps fall in yields, but in reality secondary property was not worth this adjustment. One needed to be mindful that the UK would have a slow economic recovery and would have to pay off all that government debt.

In the Americas, US rents have generally declined, with New York City as the exception. One needed to be mindful about the general lack of planning controls in the US and its impact on supply. South American governments needed to become less corrupt if more property investment was to happen there.

Overlaying all of this was the panorama of world global cities. They were definitely in a class of their own. Tony felt that the historical reason of why they existed was a good enough reason for their continued prosperity. London City rents were much closer aligned to world GDP than domestic UK GDP. London, Paris New York City, Frankfurt (which apparently keeps trying), Hong Kong and Tokyo were the main global cities. Shanghai was an upstart. Dubai was a city which forced itself on you for global attention, but had not really made the grade.

Where to invest and where to avoid was all down to the degree of property development, how it could be controlled, the security of income and the specific country. Investors needed to have their eyes wide open when investing in developing economies. If one has the stomach and the requisite timeline, then there were opportunities on a selective basis as outlined above.

DR. K. A. SIERACKI