When addressing our Lunch on 17th March 2011, Wilson Lee, Managing Partner of First Growth Real Estate Capital LLP, was confronting a topic of close interest to all his audience – how and when will the capital markets return to normal?
He started his talk with a resumé of how we got into this pickle in the first place. It might be summarised as a thorough exercise of what I paraphrase as 'due indigence': people failed to think through the inherent risks of domino effects in the structures that were being created, and didn’t build the contracts properly. When the music stopped, financial institutions across the Western World found themselves short of several chairs.
The political and fiscal responses, and uncertainties about what those responses might be, led, perhaps inevitably, to a capital market distorted in many respects. Banks are still in a state of flux. Whilst many US Banks have 'marked to market', that process is, in Wilson’s view, by no means complete in Europe; this implies more pain to come, and more reluctance to lend. In Europe, around £260bn of bonds fall due in 2011/12. Whilst some of these may be extended, there will be a very substantial pool to be re-financed in what will be a highly unfavourable climate. Wilson’s worry is that, as and when interest rates start to rise, lender tolerance will recede. This will lead to increasing defaults, cranking up the pain to the Banks. There are signs of this already as applications to the ECB for emergency loans have exploded.
Against this torrid background, investors crave liquidity and security; if both are not available, prices take a big hit. In property terms, we have moved from a position of the spread between prime and secondary property being too narrow during the bubble years to being too wide today; as an aside, Wilson thought that this might indicate some opportunities.
It was a testament to Wilson’s delivery skills and the value of what he was saying that, up to this point, there had been no suicides amongst members or guests. How will it all be resolved? Wilson was clear that there are more failures to come before the system is purged. There is, however, no shortage of capital in the world – witness, for example, Sovereign Wealth Funds. There is fear, and there is a mismatch between investors’ expectations and the returns that are actually likely to be available to them. Fear should recede if governments take steps to encourage wealth creation, both at the macro-economic level and in local initiatives. Wilson was also optimistic, I think(!), that Institutions will identify the opportunities open to them whilst the Banks occupy the Recovery Ward. In case that made us happy, however, Wilson suggested that we were not yet half way through the trough, if the previous upsets for capitalism were anything to go by.
Michael Mallinson, Scribe
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
The Year of Living Dangerously
Our luncheon guest speaker for January 20, 2011 was Walter Boettcher, Colliers International. The year 2010 was better than most had forecast. However, he said there are a number of downside risks for 2011 –
- Inflation - Is it the wrong type? Main headline inflation is being caused by oil, food and commodities as a result of demand from emerging markets, and this is forecast to continue.
- Eurozone Collapse – sovereign defaults and the possibility of a country going bust.
- Currency Wars – ongoing tension with China, the US and the rest of the world.
- Food Risks – risk of reduced production and continued increase in demand from population growth.
- Natural Disasters
There was a big bounceback in values in 2010.
Secondary assets are vulnerable to a potential pricing readjustment, especially if the banks ‘open the floodgates’ of putting distressed properties on the market. For NAMA there was no real focus yet. However, Lloyds and RBS were moving forward as they now have the teams in place.
The HOT sectors were
The concerns over property and inflation were making people question if property was truly a hedge against inflation. Do equities actually provide a better bet?
Asset management in 2011 will be the main factor that will drive property performance.
| Total return forecasts | 2011 | 2012 |
| Colliers: | 7.5% pa | 10.6% pa |
| Derivatives implied return: | 4.5% pa | 2.5% pa |
Respectfully submitted,
Shailendra Shah
Monday, December 13, 2010
UK Market Pauses for Breath
An Analysis of Diverging Performance Trends
Phil Tily, UK and Ireland Managing Director of Investment Property Databank (IPD – www.ipd.com), does not, on first appearance, seem very like an angel – lacking the obligatory wings. However, he fulfils the function of recording angel for the commercial property investment industry. At our lunch on 9th December 2010 he gave us a masterly thumbnail sketch of the view this task gives him of the UK market and its drivers. At the macro level, his analysis of property portfolios demonstrates two things: over extended periods, property at the asset level loses value due to depreciation – ‘gather ye income whilst ye may’, but within that trend changes in investor sentiment leads to considerable variation. Secondly, the various sectors of the market tend to move in tandem and he rather wonders whether the investor’s mantra should change from ‘location, location’ to ‘timing, timing’; it seems clear that, in good times, all benefit, but in decline strategy becomes crucial. Within that long term framework, in recent times values in the investment markets that he analyses have recovered to levels that are consonant with a long term trend – way below the speculative peaks of early 2007, peaks driven by easy borrowing and retail commoditisation of property, but above the low point of June 2009 and now much on a par with the early 2000s. In response to a question, he relied upon his heavenly status and was not willing to be drawn on whether that implied ‘fair value’. This recovery, however, now seems to have lost momentum. Has it run its course and are we now at a point of inflection for investor sentiment? Is this the point for momentum investors to leave the room? The bear factors include the amount of debt not yet unwound, the prospect of rather extended economic weakness, doubts about the ability of the private sector to take up the slack arising from government retrenchment and, perhaps, the prospect of government bond yields rising. Against this lies the apparent weight of overseas money still seeking UK assets.
Looking at the market at present, and perhaps belying a little his dislike of ‘location, location’, it seems clear that the focal point of further strength in the market will be London-based. London and the South East seem to be the only areas that possess the economic strengths that will enable growth in the new economic climate; other areas will suffer from government retrenchment, but have little to fall back on. London, less so the South East, is also the area that foreign investors find attractive. As to prime versus secondary, whilst, by definition, prime rents are more secure and prices hold up better over time, the yield available on secondary property seems to him to be rather tempting; if total returns are going to be less than in the past, income becomes more significant. Beyond that, whilst the price differential may widen alarmingly at times of trouble, it narrows when bluer skies return. In the London office market there are also interesting possibilities in changes of definition. The all-singing and all-dancing large plate dealing floors may, with modern wireless technology, seem over-specified; modesty may command a premium. Risky, perhaps, but tempting.
Finally Phil gave us, not a forecast, but an interesting statistic (not that his others were uninteresting!). His research shows that, in the 3 years following an Australian win in the Ashes UK values rise by 4.5%. After an England win they rise by 16%. There was only one person in the room willing to short UK property.
Michael Mallinson, Chapter Scribe
Phil Tily, UK and Ireland Managing Director of Investment Property Databank (IPD – www.ipd.com), does not, on first appearance, seem very like an angel – lacking the obligatory wings. However, he fulfils the function of recording angel for the commercial property investment industry. At our lunch on 9th December 2010 he gave us a masterly thumbnail sketch of the view this task gives him of the UK market and its drivers. At the macro level, his analysis of property portfolios demonstrates two things: over extended periods, property at the asset level loses value due to depreciation – ‘gather ye income whilst ye may’, but within that trend changes in investor sentiment leads to considerable variation. Secondly, the various sectors of the market tend to move in tandem and he rather wonders whether the investor’s mantra should change from ‘location, location’ to ‘timing, timing’; it seems clear that, in good times, all benefit, but in decline strategy becomes crucial. Within that long term framework, in recent times values in the investment markets that he analyses have recovered to levels that are consonant with a long term trend – way below the speculative peaks of early 2007, peaks driven by easy borrowing and retail commoditisation of property, but above the low point of June 2009 and now much on a par with the early 2000s. In response to a question, he relied upon his heavenly status and was not willing to be drawn on whether that implied ‘fair value’. This recovery, however, now seems to have lost momentum. Has it run its course and are we now at a point of inflection for investor sentiment? Is this the point for momentum investors to leave the room? The bear factors include the amount of debt not yet unwound, the prospect of rather extended economic weakness, doubts about the ability of the private sector to take up the slack arising from government retrenchment and, perhaps, the prospect of government bond yields rising. Against this lies the apparent weight of overseas money still seeking UK assets.
Looking at the market at present, and perhaps belying a little his dislike of ‘location, location’, it seems clear that the focal point of further strength in the market will be London-based. London and the South East seem to be the only areas that possess the economic strengths that will enable growth in the new economic climate; other areas will suffer from government retrenchment, but have little to fall back on. London, less so the South East, is also the area that foreign investors find attractive. As to prime versus secondary, whilst, by definition, prime rents are more secure and prices hold up better over time, the yield available on secondary property seems to him to be rather tempting; if total returns are going to be less than in the past, income becomes more significant. Beyond that, whilst the price differential may widen alarmingly at times of trouble, it narrows when bluer skies return. In the London office market there are also interesting possibilities in changes of definition. The all-singing and all-dancing large plate dealing floors may, with modern wireless technology, seem over-specified; modesty may command a premium. Risky, perhaps, but tempting.
Finally Phil gave us, not a forecast, but an interesting statistic (not that his others were uninteresting!). His research shows that, in the 3 years following an Australian win in the Ashes UK values rise by 4.5%. After an England win they rise by 16%. There was only one person in the room willing to short UK property.
Michael Mallinson, Chapter Scribe
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Like Nowhere Else
'Like Nowhere Else' - London's West End saw strong growth in 2009 and 2010. Is it set for further growth? Or could growth stall and reduce in 2011 and beyond?
Richard Dickinson gave us an erudite overview of the economic and political environment and prospects for the West End. He set out the positives behind significant strong performance in the midst of recession. At the same time questioned, with the era of austerity upon us, how can the West End continue to invest to keep it as a World Class destination?
Some of the answers lie in the continued success and support of the private sector to the Business Improvement District. Property owners could provide matched funding to the expected BID renewal at the end of 2011. The private sector is however already facing the 2% Business Rate supplement to help fund Cross Rail. This overall £16bn investment should add 30% capacity to tube travel. Westminster is examining ways to retain and reallocate rateable values. It has already been innovative in agreeing S106 credit offsets for investment in the public realm. Tax incremental finance is a medium term possibility for 2013 onwards.
The positives for the West End in 2010 are an 8% pa increase in sales, record rental levels, plus significant investment in flagship stores. These positives being supported by low interest rates, relatively strong economy (65% consumer driven) and growing tourism visits (25% are overseas visitors with a further 20% of visitors from the rest of the UK) helped by the level of the £. Also with a strong bias towards fashion the retail offer is more resilient to the impact of on line spending. The issue is the extent to which these factors continue to underpin growth or whether the VAT and NI increases in 2011 will slow or even reverse these trends.
In a lively Q&A the wide ranging discussion covered the impact of the 2012 Olympics, other suburban and out of town retailing, and whether the West End is and will struggle to maintain its identity. With rents escalating where is space for the street trader and independent retailer? Can the New West End Company ensure the West End keeps its true London identity and heritage, whilst being a destination for the worlds' and UK's leading branded Retailers?
Michael Mallinson
Scribe
Richard Dickinson gave us an erudite overview of the economic and political environment and prospects for the West End. He set out the positives behind significant strong performance in the midst of recession. At the same time questioned, with the era of austerity upon us, how can the West End continue to invest to keep it as a World Class destination?
Some of the answers lie in the continued success and support of the private sector to the Business Improvement District. Property owners could provide matched funding to the expected BID renewal at the end of 2011. The private sector is however already facing the 2% Business Rate supplement to help fund Cross Rail. This overall £16bn investment should add 30% capacity to tube travel. Westminster is examining ways to retain and reallocate rateable values. It has already been innovative in agreeing S106 credit offsets for investment in the public realm. Tax incremental finance is a medium term possibility for 2013 onwards.
The positives for the West End in 2010 are an 8% pa increase in sales, record rental levels, plus significant investment in flagship stores. These positives being supported by low interest rates, relatively strong economy (65% consumer driven) and growing tourism visits (25% are overseas visitors with a further 20% of visitors from the rest of the UK) helped by the level of the £. Also with a strong bias towards fashion the retail offer is more resilient to the impact of on line spending. The issue is the extent to which these factors continue to underpin growth or whether the VAT and NI increases in 2011 will slow or even reverse these trends.
In a lively Q&A the wide ranging discussion covered the impact of the 2012 Olympics, other suburban and out of town retailing, and whether the West End is and will struggle to maintain its identity. With rents escalating where is space for the street trader and independent retailer? Can the New West End Company ensure the West End keeps its true London identity and heritage, whilst being a destination for the worlds' and UK's leading branded Retailers?
Michael Mallinson
Scribe
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Sovereign Debt Crisis
and the consequences for real estate
a presentation by Jose Luis Pellicer of the Research Team at AEW Europe
I have never had a serious operation, but I recalled my limited experiences during Jose’s address to our lunch on 16th September 2010. You are woken after the operation, with the surgeon staring at you. You, at first, wonder whether he is St Peter or the other chap, but then he reassures you that the operation went well. After a moment’s relief, your thoughts then turn to how awful you feel and how impossible it will be to recover. Well, Jose assured us that the operation of rescuing the financial system had gone well -– "Armageddon avoided" as he put it. But the cost has been vastly over-extended government finances in most of the major economies. Recovery involves the unwinding of that. His prognosis was that the job would take at least another 12 to 18 months, with the pain making physiotherapy look a doddle. Should governments not address the issue and default, then that would be even more painful in our sophisticated market economies. In response to a question, whilst there are clear risks for Greece, and, to a lesser extent, for Portugal and Ireland, many others who offer poor stats may not be as weak as they seem. For example, in Spain its 20% unemployment figure includes many immigrants who may return home, and household indebtedness is much less than in the UK. He therefore presently sees little risk of a domino effect to major economies – provided that we take the medicine (or do the exercises!).
Jose could not see the cavalry arriving in the form of non-Western economies. South America is too small to be material, and China shows every sign of over-heating – which would be very negative for Germany and Eastern Europe.
The only realistic tool available to most governments is to reduce expenditures; waiting for economic growth to rebalance the books is not a viable option. Our concern must therefore be on the effects of this solution on real estate.
In some ways, we have been in a sort of ‘phoney war’ since the immediate crisis was stemmed. Not unnaturally, the immediate effect was to make investors risk-averse. This favoured, perhaps paradoxically, government bonds and also apparently-secure forms of real estate, thus buoying prices, but Jose doubts whether that will be sustained. The occupation market is bound to be hit and this must, surely, cause yields to soften – perhaps considerably. He particularly drew attention to the retail and ‘logistical’ market. Demand is bound to fall, perhaps dramatically. In many parts of Europe there are already worrying levels of retail over-supply. One questioner asked whether the weight of money could see property yields harden however due to inflationary fears; Jose thought not.
All-in-all, Jose was not a bearer of good tidings. If the issues are faced, there will be pain, but recovery will come. He was asked whether the process might not become politicised; whilst accepting that this was a risk, and, inevitably, cuts will require political decisions, he was optimistic that politicians would not worsen the situation. That was about the only positive note your Scribe was able to write down, plus, of course, the pleasure of hearing a speaker who was master of his subject. We wish Jose well in front of a ‘home’ audience when he speaks at the inaugural lunch of the new Chapter in Madrid on the 29th September.
Michael Mallinson
Scribe
a presentation by Jose Luis Pellicer of the Research Team at AEW Europe
I have never had a serious operation, but I recalled my limited experiences during Jose’s address to our lunch on 16th September 2010. You are woken after the operation, with the surgeon staring at you. You, at first, wonder whether he is St Peter or the other chap, but then he reassures you that the operation went well. After a moment’s relief, your thoughts then turn to how awful you feel and how impossible it will be to recover. Well, Jose assured us that the operation of rescuing the financial system had gone well -– "Armageddon avoided" as he put it. But the cost has been vastly over-extended government finances in most of the major economies. Recovery involves the unwinding of that. His prognosis was that the job would take at least another 12 to 18 months, with the pain making physiotherapy look a doddle. Should governments not address the issue and default, then that would be even more painful in our sophisticated market economies. In response to a question, whilst there are clear risks for Greece, and, to a lesser extent, for Portugal and Ireland, many others who offer poor stats may not be as weak as they seem. For example, in Spain its 20% unemployment figure includes many immigrants who may return home, and household indebtedness is much less than in the UK. He therefore presently sees little risk of a domino effect to major economies – provided that we take the medicine (or do the exercises!).
Jose could not see the cavalry arriving in the form of non-Western economies. South America is too small to be material, and China shows every sign of over-heating – which would be very negative for Germany and Eastern Europe.
The only realistic tool available to most governments is to reduce expenditures; waiting for economic growth to rebalance the books is not a viable option. Our concern must therefore be on the effects of this solution on real estate.
In some ways, we have been in a sort of ‘phoney war’ since the immediate crisis was stemmed. Not unnaturally, the immediate effect was to make investors risk-averse. This favoured, perhaps paradoxically, government bonds and also apparently-secure forms of real estate, thus buoying prices, but Jose doubts whether that will be sustained. The occupation market is bound to be hit and this must, surely, cause yields to soften – perhaps considerably. He particularly drew attention to the retail and ‘logistical’ market. Demand is bound to fall, perhaps dramatically. In many parts of Europe there are already worrying levels of retail over-supply. One questioner asked whether the weight of money could see property yields harden however due to inflationary fears; Jose thought not.
All-in-all, Jose was not a bearer of good tidings. If the issues are faced, there will be pain, but recovery will come. He was asked whether the process might not become politicised; whilst accepting that this was a risk, and, inevitably, cuts will require political decisions, he was optimistic that politicians would not worsen the situation. That was about the only positive note your Scribe was able to write down, plus, of course, the pleasure of hearing a speaker who was master of his subject. We wish Jose well in front of a ‘home’ audience when he speaks at the inaugural lunch of the new Chapter in Madrid on the 29th September.
Michael Mallinson
Scribe
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Private Sector Climate Change Solutions
“Private Sector Climate Change Solutions: Do governments even need to get involved under the Copenhagen Accord?” a talk to Lambda Alpha International by Dr. Douglas Crawford-Brown, Executive Director, 4CMR, University of Cambridge Sustainability, Pell Frischmann (June 24, 2010. For a summary of Dr. Crawford-Brown's presentation, click HERE. [.pdf]
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Conservation Significance:
Have we lost the plot? What's it all about ???
Anthony Walker is co-author of Building Sustainability in the Balance (published by Estates Gazettte) and founding partner of DLG Architects, Accredited in Building Conservation with a particular interest in the 20th century and conservation management.
Clearly, he is a man who cares deeply about the conservation of the built environment, and he used our lunch on 29th April 2010 to express his concerns that the regulations against which we, in Britain are trying to do the job are not, to use the current phrase, "fit for purpose". The recently-introduced PPS5, Planning and the Historic Environment, has added to his anxiety. The core of the problem, as he sees it, is that the rules, and the guidance issued by English Heritage use words that are highly subjective and capable of extensive interpretation. Whilst this may bring work to consultants and lawyers for years to come, it militates against owners and developers who wish to engage constructively, and is not conducive of consistent outcomes. The result of all this is that local authorities tend to become formulaic in their approach, with great divergence in the lines that they take. The whole process is being driven, in Anthony’s view, by "order" rather than "ideas". In part this reflects, of course, the training of conservation officers, few of whom understand architecture, or design.. They thus feel unable to hear and interpret ideas in the language of architects. There is also a need for all involved in conservation to better understand the economics and commercial realities of property ownership and different uses.
This rather rote-driven approach becomes of particular difficulty with 20th Century buildings. The diversity of architectural language developed and deployed in buildings of that century is particularly impenetrable to a rule-based approach. Anthony gave us the particular example of the Commonwealth Institute building in Kensington. In a sensitive location abutting Holland Park, its most striking external feature is its roofline. However, the building contains extensive detailing in both design and lay-out that reflects its historical genesis. In discussions about its future, these all seemed to get swept away, with only the roof becoming the icon!
In subsequent discussion, comparison was made with Europe, particularly France and Spain. The Spanish, whilst being meticulous in conserving valuable detail, are far more willing to consider modern additions provided that thought is given to how the original architect might have treated the issue; they do not seek pastiche. The French seek to conserve much less, but what they do conserve, they conserve thoroughly and well. This led Anthony to argue that our approach to conservation seems to far too broad-brush, with everything including the kitchen sink being swept in.
As a personal aside, the debate reminded me of the anguish of engaging, in education, with Ofsted; when dealing with intangibles, officialdom has problems. Judging by the furrowed brows, Anthony’s talk gave us some cause to worry, but it is always a pleasure to hear speaker talking with passion on his subject
Michael Mallinson
Anthony Walker is co-author of Building Sustainability in the Balance (published by Estates Gazettte) and founding partner of DLG Architects, Accredited in Building Conservation with a particular interest in the 20th century and conservation management.
Clearly, he is a man who cares deeply about the conservation of the built environment, and he used our lunch on 29th April 2010 to express his concerns that the regulations against which we, in Britain are trying to do the job are not, to use the current phrase, "fit for purpose". The recently-introduced PPS5, Planning and the Historic Environment, has added to his anxiety. The core of the problem, as he sees it, is that the rules, and the guidance issued by English Heritage use words that are highly subjective and capable of extensive interpretation. Whilst this may bring work to consultants and lawyers for years to come, it militates against owners and developers who wish to engage constructively, and is not conducive of consistent outcomes. The result of all this is that local authorities tend to become formulaic in their approach, with great divergence in the lines that they take. The whole process is being driven, in Anthony’s view, by "order" rather than "ideas". In part this reflects, of course, the training of conservation officers, few of whom understand architecture, or design.. They thus feel unable to hear and interpret ideas in the language of architects. There is also a need for all involved in conservation to better understand the economics and commercial realities of property ownership and different uses.
This rather rote-driven approach becomes of particular difficulty with 20th Century buildings. The diversity of architectural language developed and deployed in buildings of that century is particularly impenetrable to a rule-based approach. Anthony gave us the particular example of the Commonwealth Institute building in Kensington. In a sensitive location abutting Holland Park, its most striking external feature is its roofline. However, the building contains extensive detailing in both design and lay-out that reflects its historical genesis. In discussions about its future, these all seemed to get swept away, with only the roof becoming the icon!
In subsequent discussion, comparison was made with Europe, particularly France and Spain. The Spanish, whilst being meticulous in conserving valuable detail, are far more willing to consider modern additions provided that thought is given to how the original architect might have treated the issue; they do not seek pastiche. The French seek to conserve much less, but what they do conserve, they conserve thoroughly and well. This led Anthony to argue that our approach to conservation seems to far too broad-brush, with everything including the kitchen sink being swept in.
As a personal aside, the debate reminded me of the anguish of engaging, in education, with Ofsted; when dealing with intangibles, officialdom has problems. Judging by the furrowed brows, Anthony’s talk gave us some cause to worry, but it is always a pleasure to hear speaker talking with passion on his subject
Michael Mallinson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)